Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14F1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Prestige 14Evo B13M
MotherboardMSI MS-14F1  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime8 Days
Run DateNov 01 '24 at 00:21
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 57.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 221
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 713
66% 552 Pts
64-Core 1,201
74% 1,201 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 65%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 131F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3688
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 20.8
12% 18.7 fps
MRender 19.1
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 0.3
11% 14.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1339 1398 1442 571 79 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,445
Write 1,407
Mixed 1,184
SusWrite 818
273% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 20.7
201% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 921
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 757
568% 766 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 198%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
127% Outstanding
MC Read 47
MC Write 56.5
MC Mixed 48.7
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 127%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0A42
Typical MS-14F1 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-14F1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback