Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	84.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160329
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '18 at 20:26
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 76.4 2-Core 140 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 478 44% 369 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 115 Parallax 107 88% 110 fps	MRender 89.6 Gravity 99.4 Splatting 94.2 77% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 111GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4799431 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -37778532330126 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3505 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 145 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 34 85901574171 (C2) HDA temperature 27 34 85901574171 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4799431 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4799431 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4799431 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 308 (EA) Unknown 0 0 228 (F1) Unknown 0 0 228 (F2) Unknown 0 0 567	63.2% Good	Read 490 Write 168 Mixed 247 66% 302 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 16.4 85% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 54.1 76% 142 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 87%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7204 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4782 (B1) Unknown 94 94 188 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 57 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 166 (F1) Unknown 99 99 32120843447	62.2% Good	Read 457 Write 265 Mixed 329 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 17.6 71% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 76.4 DQ Mixed 48.8 59% 107 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 86%
Seagate ST500NM0011 500GB-$66 1,945 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 293GB free Firmware: SN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 63 98714981 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7245 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 1888844 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7469 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5773 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 73 250 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 50 555548705 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 266 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8412 (C2) HDA temperature 33 50 81604378657 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 115 99 98714981 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 261	42.2% Average	Read 76.6 Write 70.1 Mixed 68.1 54% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.55 120% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 84%
Seagate ST500NM0011 500GB-$66 1,945 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 156GB free Firmware: SN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 63 120991584 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6632 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 79764672 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7740 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5772 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 65557 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 50 538705952 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 278 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7472 (C2) HDA temperature 32 50 81604378656 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 117 99 120991584 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 97	59.5% Above average	Read 107 Write 99.7 Mixed 105 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x8GB 2,056 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.8% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 18.9 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 13.9 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	48x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	27x
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	4x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 10 samples	4x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 58%, 5,634 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $642

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16