HP Zbook 17 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemHP Zbook 17 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2255
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150226
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 26 '16 at 21:22
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 169
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 444
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2255) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4112
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 7.72
4% 6.68 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 9.04
6% 7.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 462
Write 115
Mixed 155
53% 244 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 11.7
67% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 86.2
DQ Mixed 49.5
50% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zbook 17 G2 Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Zbook 17 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback