Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H61  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '18 at 06:42
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 163
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 308
39% 298 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 17
Parallax 21
19% 20.4 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 4TB
554GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13% Very poor
Read 79.1
Write 82.1
Mixed 58.7
16% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.98
4K Write 6.63
4K Mixed 2.94
16% 5.19 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 15%
52netbar iShareDisk 128GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 88.1
Write 77.6
Mixed 85.4
63% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.25
4K Write 6.99
4K Mixed 3.65
795% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback