Asus P5KPL-AM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '18 at 20:14
Run Duration435 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7400-$130
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 75.1
41% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 73.2
8-Core 76.4
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 77.5
5% 77.5 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 130
Sapphire(174B 9450) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 1.12
3% 3.43 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 3.87
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
351GB free
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 107
Write 96.7
Mixed 113
80% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.32
79% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 88%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 90.6
Mixed 38.8
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.41
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 53%
Samsung SV1533D 15GB
14GB free
Firmware: ML101-48 Max speed: UDMA 66 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 20.3
Write 20.9
Mixed 19.6
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.24
57% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 3.91
Mixed 6.36
10% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.32
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.03
15% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 3.8
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback