Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3735F 6,544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 15 2-Core 29.6 28% 36.4 Pts	4-Core 46.9 8-Core 51.4 6% 49.2 Pts	64-Core 57.3 4% 57.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1027 2014) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.69% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.78 1% 0.8 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.12 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.69% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba 032GE4 31GB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 169 Write 64.2 Mixed 86.9 23% 107 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 8.66 48% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 20.2 DQ Mixed 7.98 10% 17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 26%
Generic AS SD Card 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free Firmware: 15.15 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.4% Very poor	Read 22.6 Write 12.3 Mixed 15 12% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.98 4K Write 0.58 4K Mixed 0.5 232% 1.69 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 10%
Lexar JumpDrive S23 USB 3.0 32GB-$30 609 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 17GB free, PID a833 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 36.6 Write 12.4 Mixed 25.1 28% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.69 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.65 66% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x2GB 2,198 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6.6 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM