Packard ixtreme M5741

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemPackard ixtreme M5741  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard H57M01
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 22:50
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 148
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 364
41% 321 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 3635) 3GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 32.6
22% 28.3 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 25.9
25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.7% Good
Read 265
Write 212
Mixed 219
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 30.9
102% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 62.9
68% 115 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB-$135
68GB free
Firmware: STDOA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 78.1
Write 56.4
Mixed 78.4
54% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.28
71% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
Read 111
Write 118
Mixed 72.3
127% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.32
77% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.6% Average
Read 115
Write 106
Mixed 81.8
126% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.33
76% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600EL Series 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.4% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ixtreme M5741 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5741

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback