Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '18 at 13:50
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 76
2-Core 153
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 296
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M10
Nvidia(10DE 1160) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 386.9
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 19.5
18% 19.2 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 54GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 46
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 15.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 100%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback