Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Xen HVM domU (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20060824
Uptime	20.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '18 at 08:44
Run Duration	518 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2686 v4 164 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 75 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 173 65% 112 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 570 56% 455 Pts	64-Core 926 57% 926 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
AWS PVDISK 644GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 426GB free Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 53% Great: 91%
AWS PVDISK 54GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 121GB free Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 57%
AWS PVDISK 54GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 121GB free Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 57%
AWS PVDISK 54GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 121GB free Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 57%
AWS PVDISK 54GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 121GB free Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 57%
AWS PVDISK 215GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 88GB free Firmware: 2.0 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 73.2 Write 135 Mixed 90.6 75% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.97 4K Write 5.16 4K Mixed 3.85 606% 3.66 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 106%
AWS PVDISK 129GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 65GB free Firmware: 2.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 72 Write 139 Mixed 89.7 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 2.37 4K Write 5.28 4K Mixed 4.55 702% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 61%
AWS PVDISK 107GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 92%
AWS PVDISK 107GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 13GB free Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 92%
AWS PVDISK 11GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 12GB free Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 66%
AWS PVDISK 11GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 12GB free Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 66%
AWS PVDISK 11GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 12GB free Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 66%
AWS PVDISK 11GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 12GB free Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 52.6 MC Write 47.3 MC Mixed 43.6 137% 47.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

RAM
29GBUnknownBench 65%, 119 samples	26x
1x15GBUnknownBench 59%, 628 samples	14x
44GBUnknownBench 23%, 6,316 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397