Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '16 at 00:09
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 96.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 228
85% 147 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 580
63% 499 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8533) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5582
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Lighting 89.7
Reflection 92.8
Parallax 80.6
73% 87.7 fps
MRender 82.9
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 74
64% 79.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230
200GB free
Firmware: L2010420 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 472
Mixed 471
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 34.8
128% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 140
146% 239 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Marvell Raid VD 0 240GB
180GB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 386
Write 136
Mixed 181
51% 234 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 13.5
58% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 58.3
60% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 82%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 109
Write 138
Mixed 118
92% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.73
4K Mixed 0.42
122% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 72%
H/W RAID 5 9TB
4.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 130
Write 75.1
Mixed 55.5
99% 87 MB/s
4K Read 3.34
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.7
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 52.3
76% 52.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback