Gatewa W3503

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGatewa W3503  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel D101GGC
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '18 at 21:56
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz
, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 28.1
2-Core 38.1
29% 40.4 Pts
4-Core 39.1
8-Core 39.3
5% 39.2 Pts
64-Core 39.2
2% 39.2 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 17
Parallax 20.6
19% 20.1 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6L100P0 100GB-$33
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BAJ41G20 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 58
Write 62.5
Mixed 52.3
43% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 3.52
4K Mixed 0.3
122% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
28GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 22.5
Write 18.4
Mixed 18.9
25% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4.39
4K Mixed 2.22
240% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.47% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 2.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.1
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.47%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback