Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$150 18,432 User benchmarks, average bench 45% SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 16.3 2-Core 18.8 9% 17.5 Pts	4-Core 56.1 8-Core 82.3 9% 69.2 Pts	64-Core 87.9 5% 87.9 Pts
Poor: 31% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2935) CLim: 1175 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.1.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 26.3 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 32.1 21% 28 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 24.2 Splatting 30.8 23% 27.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545025B9S 250GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 227GB free Firmware: PB2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 73.1 Write 75.6 Mixed 74.8 56% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.29 74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 46%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 13GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 4.78 Mixed 8.38 14% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.24 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.49 83% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.53% Terrible	MC Read 1.1 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 0.9 4% 1.23 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.6 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.37 GB/s	Latency 514 8% 514 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $138

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16