HP EliteDesk 705 G1 DM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G1 DM  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 225E
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '18 at 02:02
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 81
44% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 133
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 225E) 960MB
Ram: 960MB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 2.28
3% 3.29 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Oemssd24 0GB 240GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q120 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.1% Very good
Read 498
Write 420
Mixed 472
103% 463 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 6.69
89% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 37
DQ Mixed 6.35
25% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3160ED58E9W1600 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 14.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G1 DM Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G1 DM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback