| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161214 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 17 '18 at 06:53 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 28% |
PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.4%
Very good
|
74% 129 Pts
|
53% 397 Pts
|
24% 380 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
18% 18.7 fps
|
18% 22.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.8%
Very good
|
72% 25.3 GB/s
|
58% 20.4 GB/s
|
55% 72.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDS Builds (Compare 598 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 126x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $46Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 102x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 98x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 65x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 42x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 39x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $192 |