Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory30 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '18 at 13:30
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 126
55% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 306
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
Sapphire(174B E284) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 29.6
23% 27.5 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 29.8
21% 25.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 478
Write 382
Mixed 402
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 36.2
132% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 51.3
56% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
359GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 93.7
Mixed 91.2
70% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.14
49% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 61%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 124GB
63GB free, PID 00d2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 4.73
Mixed 4.16
12% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.01
28% 2.51 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 994055 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback