Asus M2N-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M2N-E  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '16 at 11:35
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 71
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 89.1
44% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 177
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Gigabyte(1458 21C5) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 3.12
3% 4.35 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 3.37
Splatting 4
3% 3.44 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SVP200S37A1 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506A
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 220
Write 148
Mixed 176
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 13
69% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 74.6
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 35.1
36% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%
Maxtor 6Y120P0 123GB
109GB free
Firmware: YAR41BW0 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 55
Write 58
Mixed 55.8
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.37
98% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 2048, 512 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-E Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback