Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte AB350M-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '18 at 20:37
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$121
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 213
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 609
62% 499 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 1.09
3% 3.12 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 483
Write 213
Mixed 176
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 8.37
78% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 47.4
DQ Mixed 9.23
15% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
68GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3CF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 77.8
Write 79.7
Mixed 76.2
59% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.44
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 74%
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 11GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.3% Very poor
Read 19.1
Write 22.3
Mixed 24.6
17% 22 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 3.03
4K Mixed 0.48
160% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 29.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 24.8
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte AB350M-DS3H - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback