Asus X555LJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X555LJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LJ
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150804
Uptime21.8 Days
Run DateApr 06 '18 at 21:06
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
25.8% Poor
Memory 27.8
1-Core 15.9
2-Core 36.8
17% 26.8 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 137
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M
Asus(1043 1A6D) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.6909
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 5.84
2% 4.12 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 5.39
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 81.2
Write 57.4
Mixed 72.5
53% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.17
52% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 268
15% 268 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555LJ Builds (Compare 1,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback