TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Packard imedia S1300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard imedia S1300  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S1300
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '18 at 18:18
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 66
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 68.1
38% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 76.1
8-Core 77.6
10% 76.8 Pts
64-Core 75.1
5% 75.1 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 39.3%
 Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315
Sapphire(174B 1141) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 1.12
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 3.52
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 2
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 2.07%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 49.4
Write 52.3
Mixed 57.5
40% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.21
67% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 29.3%
 Great: 35%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB
300GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 15.4
Write 15.6
Mixed 8.3
16% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.25
59% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 10.1%
 Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-047.A00LF 9905471-006.A01LF 12GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 7.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 18.8%
 Great: 25%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical imedia S1300 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S1300

CPU
Athlon II X2 220AMDBench 39%, 5,045 samples8x
Athlon II X2 215AMD  $29Bench 38%, 4,513 samples4x
Athlon II X4 620AMDBench 44%, 5,981 samples2x
GPU
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples3x
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples2x
SSD
860 EVO 500GBSamsungBench 68%, 207 samples3x
Agility 3 120GBOCZ  $102Bench 49%, 38,562 samples1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples1x
RAM
GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 4GBUnknownBench 25%, 202 samples3x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples2x
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnifosaBench 35%, 775 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback