Medion ERAZER P5379 I/C305

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion ERAZER P5379 I/C305  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM2
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 18:22
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 213
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 623
61% 502 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Sapphire(174B 6438) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.8% Above average
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 68
Parallax 58.5
55% 64.8 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 61.3
51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 508
Write 250
Mixed 292
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 17.1
95% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 17.4
81% 184 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 83%
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.1% Excellent
Read 148
Write 146
Mixed 135
107% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.2
88% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.5
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ERAZER P5379 I/C305 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Medion ERAZER P5379 I/C305

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback