Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	8.95% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53 41,461 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 83.9 1-Core 73.6 2-Core 126 59% 94.6 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 189 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 15F2) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5384 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 4.62 Parallax 1.81 3% 3.38 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 3 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ CORE 64GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.10104 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8601 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 32 100 0 (E5) Unknown 100 0 -21471777400852 (E8) Unknown 100 48 9015978831928 (E9) Unknown 100 0 21556496129 (EA) Unknown 100 0 697831532154 (EB) Unknown 100 0 537188415	8.95% Terrible	Read 44.4 Write 39.4 Mixed 75.3 12% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 0.26 4K Mixed 0.48 18% 4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.95% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905417-041.A00LF Micron 8JSF12864HZ-1G1F1 5GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.6% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 12.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	398x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	174x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	33x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	32x
SSA302G08-GDJEC 2x4GBAsintBench 47%, 787 samples	21x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188