MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Micro-Star MS-7B09
Motherboard	MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 03 '18 at 04:57
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 72.7 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 942 83% 706 Pts	64-Core 2,586 160% 2,586 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2992) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 119 Parallax 104 85% 109 fps	MRender 93.2 Gravity 97.4 Splatting 91.2 77% 93.9 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 185GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 40 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 40617 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3817 (B1) Unknown 86 86 478 (B3) Unknown 99 99 40 (B5) Unknown 99 99 40 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 40 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 56 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1137 (F1) Unknown 99 99 142083277926	99.4% Outstanding	Read 522 Write 502 Mixed 504 114% 509 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 23 128% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 77.3 101% 182 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 23755 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1492 (B1) Unknown 94 94 213 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 1 480 (F1) Unknown 99 99 63964300256	92% Outstanding	Read 523 Write 503 Mixed 502 114% 509 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 81 4K Mixed 21.4 119% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 20.7 46% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 116%
HGST Deskstar NAS 5TB-$231 660 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2.5TB free Firmware: APGNT517 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 169 169 38680330629 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1888 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11823 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1622 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6140 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6140 (C2) HDA temperature 139 139 236224184363 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	93.5% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 150 Mixed 155 120% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.99 4K Mixed 0.41 165% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 173 173 34380579161 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3984 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 27121 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3131 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6439 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6439 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 197569478693 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	99.1% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 166 Mixed 167 129% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.13 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.24 114% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 3,365 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (100^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	163% Outstanding	MC Read 64.6 MC Write 69 MC Mixed 60.8 185% 64.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 41.7 SC Mixed 26.2 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	123x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	38x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	19x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	12x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8x8GBUnknownBench 160%, 29 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $753

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16