| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Studio 1749 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 029DYC |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100128 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 09 '18 at 19:51 |
| Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3 M 330
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
|
41.9%
Average
|
43% 69.5 Pts
|
17% 124 Pts
|
8% 124 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Dell(1028 041B) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2202
|
0.78%
Terrible
|
1% 0.95 fps
|
1% 1.06 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MK5056GSY 500GB-$106
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH000D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
27.8%
Poor
|
26% 35.7 MB/s
|
74% 0.6 MB/s
| |
|
LaCie Rugged Mini USB3 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1088
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
18.6%
Very poor
|
28% 23 MB/s
|
125% 1.45 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.4%
Poor
|
23% 8.03 GB/s
|
17% 5.9 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio 1749 Builds (Compare 27 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio 1749
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 M 520Intel $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples | 10x |
| Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples | 4x |
| Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples | 20x |
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $70 |