Dell Studio 1749

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio 1749  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 029DYC
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '18 at 19:51
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 330
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 94.7
43% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 119
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Dell(1028 041B) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2202
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.84
1% 0.95 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5056GSY 500GB-$106
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH000D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 47.9
Write 48.7
Mixed 10.4
26% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.35
74% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 57%
LaCie Rugged Mini USB3 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1088
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 22.5
Mixed 18.8
28% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.49
125% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio 1749 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio 1749

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback