bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '18 at 13:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 94.4
42% 66 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 538
39% 358 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 456GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.8% Below average
Read 63.4
Write 57
Mixed 61
46% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 3.01
4K Mixed 1.65
288% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 51%
Virtual HD 161GB
24GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 63.1
Write 60.7
Mixed 57.1
45% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.14
4K Write 3.26
4K Mixed 1.71
381% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 36%
Great: 80%
Virtual HD 258GB
23GB free
Firmware: 1.1.1 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 58.5
Mixed 60.4
45% 60 MB/s
4K Read 3.18
4K Write 3.21
4K Mixed 1.59
368% 2.66 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
3968, 128 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback