QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory3.9 GB free of 5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '18 at 18:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 191
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 372
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
PwrHis(1787 2337) 2GB
CLim: 1025 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 43.9
30% 37.6 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 38.6
27% 32.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 429GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x5GB
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback