ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL552JX

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus GL552JX (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL552JX
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '16 at 08:03
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4750HQ 5,497 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 89.7 2-Core 174 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 462 49% 391 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1A8D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.17% Terrible	Lighting 9.03 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 12.3 7% 10.6 fps	MRender 12.9 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 16.4 10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.17% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandis SD7SN3Q256G1002 256GB 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: X217 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 35 100 35 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 38 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 29 (A8) Unknown 100 100 18 (A9) Unknown 100 100 484 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 11 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 56 58 249109741612 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 6 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 570 (F1) Unknown 253 253 408 (F2) Unknown 253 253 292 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	74.5% Very good	Read 417 Write 362 Mixed 391 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 19.1 92% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 52.5 79% 145 MB/s

HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 915GB free Firmware: JB0O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 138 138 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 54 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 32 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 35 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 880 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 154620002333 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	69.4% Good	Read 130 Write 111 Mixed 124 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.21 80% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-435.A00LF 16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.6% Good	MC Read 35.5 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 19 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 17.1 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GL552JX Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552JX

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	376x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	139x
Core i7-4750HQIntelBench 63%, 5,497 samples	118x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	328x
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples	235x
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 5,483 samples	67x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,448 samples	44x
M600 SATA M.2 128GBMicronBench 80%, 1,017 samples	33x
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	13x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	82x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	53x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback