Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30B9S08500

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Lenovo 30B9S08500 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 1031
Memory	41.6 GB free of 63.998 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170302
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	May 24 '18 at 09:45
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 529 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 82 1-Core 106 2-Core 208 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 842 74% 632 Pts	64-Core 3,772 234% 3,772 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M6000 24GB 361 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 1157) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 363.18 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Lighting 103 Reflection 106 Parallax 101 84% 103 fps	MRender 81.6 Gravity 89.3 Splatting 74.2 66% 81.7 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN1T0HMJP-000L1 1TB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 585GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7604 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 159 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 10 (AE) Unknown 99 99 101 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 3259 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 60 171799543838 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16637404 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9722 (F2) Unknown 99 99 14619 (F9) Unknown 99 99 10240	85.5% Excellent	Read 507 Write 423 Mixed 477 105% 469 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 27.4 102% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 17.1 58% 126 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 131%
Wd4002fyyz-23 00LF276 LENOVO 4TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 3TB free Firmware: K8J1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 120 (03) Spinup time 146 146 30088823149 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7458 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7573 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 136 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 61 404815903 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 10377 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 10377 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 167504707615 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	90% Excellent	Read 186 Write 127 Mixed 118 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 3.38 4K Mixed 0.9 205% 1.76 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 2x31.5GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 16 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.2% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.6 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback