Asus M5A97 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '18 at 21:37
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 139
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 437
41% 342 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.7% Average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 63
Parallax 73.6
52% 66.6 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 52.1
46% 57 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 496
Write 360
Mixed 391
92% 416 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 27.7
104% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 60.9
68% 116 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST1000DM0039YN162 1TB
355GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 170
Mixed 169
128% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.43
120% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
171GB free
Firmware: SD1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 102
Mixed 88.6
72% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.56
129% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO - $69

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback