Gigabyte GA-H81M-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-H  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '18 at 22:16
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 194
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 268
35% 265 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3540
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 5.54
Parallax 4.53
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.87
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fcct240m 50 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.8% Good
Read 263
Write 247
Mixed 261
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 26.1
114% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 25.9
60% 125 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 88%
WD WD2500BEVS-00UST 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.2% Below average
Read 54.3
Write 54.1
Mixed 52.5
40% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.34
97% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback