Asrock P4i945GC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock P4i945GC  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '18 at 23:22
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2.00GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 28.3
2-Core 27.9
24% 33.4 Pts
4-Core 27.8
8-Core 28.1
4% 28 Pts
64-Core 27.9
2% 27.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 24%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.1% Below average
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 36.1
Parallax 58
15% 37.3 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 133
Splatting 92.6
75% 90.2 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 233
Write 232
Mixed 210
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 10.5
47% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 22.2
DQ Mixed 12.3
12% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.68% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.68%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback