Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2.00GHz 9 User benchmarks, average bench 17% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Memory 43.9 1-Core 28.3 2-Core 27.9 24% 33.4 Pts	4-Core 27.8 8-Core 28.1 4% 28 Pts	64-Core 27.9 2% 27.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 24%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8591) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.1% Below average	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 36.1 Parallax 58 15% 37.3 fps	MRender 45 Gravity 133 Splatting 92.6 75% 90.2 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 110%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6522 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1593 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 412 (AD) Unknown 100 100 5243025 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 841 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8612	38.5% Below average	Read 233 Write 232 Mixed 210 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 10.5 47% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.9 DQ Write 22.2 DQ Mixed 12.3 12% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.68% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.8 7% 2.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.68% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM