Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110217
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 20 '16 at 06:56
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 53
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 110
35% 61.9 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 293
30% 245 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5582
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 31.2
22% 27.3 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 26
23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.10
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
100% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 182
Mixed 144
123% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 2.88
4K Mixed 0.81
188% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 750GB
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 210
Mixed 178
146% 195 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 3.02
4K Mixed 0.72
166% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback