Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111013
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 05 '18 at 05:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 160
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 474
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.4% Good
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 116
Parallax 110
62% 101 fps
MRender 95.9
Gravity 93
Splatting 96
78% 95 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 4+0 Stripe/RAID0 236GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 690
Write 204
Mixed 258
83% 384 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 23.7
130% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 65.5
75% 129 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.3% Good
Read 125
Write 115
Mixed 82
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.44
180% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 17.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 12.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback