MSI MS-16GC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE60 2OC\2OE
MotherboardMSI MS-16GC  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130801
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateJun 05 '18 at 16:10
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 76.8
42% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 212
21% 172 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 10E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 6.72
3% 8.54 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.87
5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.9% Average
Read 273
Write 177
Mixed 215
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 7.69
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 14.4
47% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 2.7
35% 83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 133%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
87GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 93.6
Mixed 83.6
70% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.25
80% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston RB16D3LS1KBG/4G 99U5428-049.A00G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GC Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback