bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory7.6 GB free of 14.0391 GB @ 0 GHz
Display967 x 689 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150702
Uptime20.9 Days
Run DateJun 13 '18 at 12:57
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 35.4
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 127
47% 85 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 206
29% 212 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.15.1.48
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.5
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 161GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 70%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 268GB
17GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 60%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 64GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 88%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 20.4
Write 21.7
Mixed 7.28
20% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.34
82% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096, 2048, 32, 8 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.8
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback