Today's hottest deals

Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardHuanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 07:40
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User KGZ-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 185
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 562
58% 466 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia(10DE 1B84) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 62.6
59% 69 fps
MRender 73.4
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 71.2
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 4TB
766GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 60.1
Write 64.1
Mixed 60.6
46% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.73
4K Write 3.99
4K Mixed 1.95
446% 3.22 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 63%
Ccboot iSCSI 587GB
201GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 59.9
Mixed 62.9
46% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.33
4K Write 3.06
4K Mixed 1.32
342% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 37%
Ccboot iSCSI 107GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 46.6
Write 51.7
Mixed 57.6
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 3.27
4K Write 3.46
4K Mixed 1.99
421% 2.91 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 55%
Ccboot iSCSI 1TB
29GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 56.7
Write 63.1
Mixed 55.4
44% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.93
4K Write 4.33
4K Mixed 2.17
485% 3.48 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 35%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 35.9
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback