Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H270M-Gaming3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161209
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '18 at 03:21
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 61.4
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 204
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 296
46% 332 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 76.4
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 67.7
62% 72.5 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 68
Splatting 67.2
56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 513
Write 252
Mixed 334
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 6.25
79% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 3.89
49% 115 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$36
460GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 151
Mixed 134
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.3
107% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback