Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3HP  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081016
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '18 at 23:33
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 77.1
39% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 73.8
8-Core 75.8
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 74.5
5% 74.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.57 fps
MRender 0.52
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 0.78
0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 250
Write 145
Mixed 167
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 22.9
70% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 81.9
DQ Write 54.3
DQ Mixed 35.6
35% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 44%
Great: 106%
Asmedia ASMT1153E 750GB
38GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 27
Write 26
Mixed 26.4
20% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.31
99% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA78G-DS3HP Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback