Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 22 '18 at 19:48
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Memory 30.1
1-Core 29.4
2-Core 45.4
22% 35 Pts
4-Core 64.6
8-Core 94.3
10% 79.4 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
MSI(1462 8097) 2GB
CLim: 550 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.53
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.69 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 489
Write 400
Mixed 409
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 9.46
54% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 22.6
DQ Mixed 9.91
11% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
644GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 104
Write 151
Mixed 117
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.38
107% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 72%
Synology iSCSI Storage 495GB
434GB free
Firmware: 4.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.2% Average
Read 48.1
Write 111
Mixed 68.7
57% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.74
4K Write 4.59
4K Mixed 3.36
614% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5.5
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 254
16% 254 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback