Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 81.1 1-Core 23.6 2-Core 79.3 41% 61.3 Pts	4-Core 68.6 8-Core 104 11% 86.1 Pts	64-Core 95.2 6% 95.2 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0494) 512MB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 391.3 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.69% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 0.91 0% 1.25 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.32 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.69% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725025A7 250GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: A230 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 47 48 54 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 14.8 Write 52.1 Mixed 14.3 SusWrite 51.9 24% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.1 40% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GB 8,698 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	716x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	303x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	96x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	54x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	41x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 268 samples	39x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62