Asrock G41C-GS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock G41C-GS  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '16 at 13:23
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 47.3
36% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 55.7
8-Core 67.8
8% 61.8 Pts
64-Core 69.1
4% 69.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Sapphire(174B 2180) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.39 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.65 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HA200JC 200GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: WS100-33 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
Read 41.4
Write 39.9
Mixed 36.1
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.12
30% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 3.1
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41C-GS Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G41C-GS - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $327
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback