Asrock B75M-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B75M-ITX  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 13:19
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 189
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 355
46% 348 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 20.4
19% 20.3 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 17
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 252 254 258 311 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 425
Write 262
Mixed 221
SusWrite 271
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 12.2
68% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 82.8
98% 166 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 84%
Samsung HM400JI 400GB
286GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67
Write 0.3
Mixed 1.8
16% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
138% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 46%
Sandisk SD8SBAT256G1122 1TB
693GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 122 119 123 125 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 121
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 100%
WD 325AS External 500GB
39GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 21
Mixed 20
SusWrite 25.7
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.5% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-ITX Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback