Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E754

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E754 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB270
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170315
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '18 at 21:27
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264 13,678 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 154 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 222 31% 229 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fujitsu(10CF 17AA) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4889 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	3.46% Terrible	Lighting 3.53 Reflection 6.27 Parallax 6.06 3% 5.29 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 7.26 5% 5.42 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.46% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WDS240G2G0A-00JH 240GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 19 2.9 81 92 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 433 Write 345 Mixed 319 SusWrite 93.3 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 17.4 72% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 75 DQ Mixed 41.8 46% 77.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 52%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 295GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 20 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	7.41% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 18.3 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 18.2 24% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 7.41% Great: 223%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 61GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 48 45 71 69 70 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.3% Excellent	Read 168 Write 45.8 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 53.5 101% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 10.5 857% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 15.6 DQ Write 22.1 DQ Mixed 13.2 1,258% 17 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 148%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB 30,873 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 13 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical LIFEBOOK E754 Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E754

CPU
Core i5-4300MIntel $264Bench 51%, 13,678 samples	48x
Core i7-4712MQIntelBench 62%, 5,324 samples	28x
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 51%, 15,981 samples	27x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	174x

SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GBSamsungBench 75%, 878 samples	15x
MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 1,578 samples	11x
MZ7TE128HMGR-00004 128GBSamsungBench 66%, 696 samples	7x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	26x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	17x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $264

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383