Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20193

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20193  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130521
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 06 '16 at 20:22
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 177
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 445
50% 389 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Legend(17AA 3972) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 7
Parallax 8.62
6% 7.78 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.97
Splatting 10
8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$40
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SM15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 68.2
Write 93.8
Mixed 41.4
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.56
193% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 65%
Generic USB3.0 Device 2TB
611GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 21.1
Mixed 13.7
23% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.29
56% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170EB68E9W1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20193 Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback