| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180226 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '18 at 06:37 |
| Run Duration | 183 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.8%
Very good
|
80% 146 Pts
|
59% 441 Pts
|
28% 449 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.8%
Very poor
|
0% 44.5 fps
|
55% 67.2 fps
| |
|
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
ASRock(1849 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
|
6.08%
Terrible
|
6% 7.42 fps
|
7% 8.02 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
835GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 17 21 27 6.1 MB/s
|
25.7%
Poor
|
32% 44.3 MB/s
|
87% 0.73 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
686GB free
Firmware: SM11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 87 85 88 89 MB/s
|
46.4%
Average
|
59% 80.2 MB/s
|
349% 2.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patriot PSD48G21332 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.7%
Below average
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
28% 9.8 GB/s
|
44% 90 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 806 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $61
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 131x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 119x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 91x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 94x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 74x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 72x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $275 |