bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory69 GB free of 96 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 09:18
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
CPU socket #0, 8 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 182
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 726
64% 541 Pts
64-Core 715
44% 715 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 12 17 14 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 110
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 13.7
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.4
197% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 91%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
98GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 4.3 4.9 5.2 7.8 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 85%
Vmware Virtual disk 14GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 11 15 17 156 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x16GB
6 of 64 slots used
96GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 43.5
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback