Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '18 at 16:35
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 127
58% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 343
34% 276 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 61.2
58% 67.2 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 68.1
56% 69.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 115 122 121 137 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 296
Write 124
Mixed 121
SusWrite 102
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 18
75% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 55.5
DQ Mixed 39.9
41% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 56%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
240GB free
Firmware: 01.01S01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 111 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 81
SusWrite 113
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2 1600 CL9 Seri F3-12800CL9-2 1600 CL9 Seri 12GB
667, 800, 667, 800 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.4% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback