Asus UX510UXK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus UX510UXK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX510UXK
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 17 '18 at 16:06
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 88%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 187
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 272
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1510) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 6.63
Reflection 13
Parallax 5.91
5% 8.5 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 5.87
Splatting 13.3
7% 8.12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30100P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 211 219 226 201 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 383
Write 247
Mixed 202
SusWrite 215
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 16.3
95% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 182
172% 271 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 55 64 63 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 60.2
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 62.1
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.4
138% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 71%
Freecom MD Classic 3.0 1TB
289GB free
Firmware: 6080
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 30 53 35 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 30
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 37.9
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
43% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
154GB free
Firmware: 060E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 10 23 12 11 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 6.7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 14.4
7% 8.85 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX510UXK Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX510UXK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback