ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek Leonite2
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '18 at 13:40
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130 8,675 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Memory 62.6 1-Core 32.7 2-Core 57.6 35% 51 Pts	4-Core 65.3 8-Core 62.9 9% 64.1 Pts	64-Core 55.6 3% 55.6 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1950 Pro 144 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 020E) 256MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.561.0.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.66 3% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB-$36 4,086 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: V54OA7BA SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 6.2 6.3 18 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.59% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 14.4 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 14.9 10% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 7.59% Great: 40%
Fujitsu MHS2030AT 30GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 28GB free Firmware: 3005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 24 23 22 19 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 24.2 Write 24.8 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 22.1 16% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 14%
JMicron Generic 60GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 44GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 22 22 18 14 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 24.9 Write 20.9 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 18.9 30% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 6.4 450% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 158%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback