Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 60.3 1-Core 62.9 2-Core 125 48% 82.7 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 462 43% 356 Pts	64-Core 1203 74% 1203 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000 1,288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Nvidia(10DE 076F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 5.2GB, Driver: 372.95 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 24.4 Parallax 19.7 15% 20.7 fps	MRender 26 Gravity 14.1 Splatting 24 18% 21.4 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Marshal MAL32000SS-T72 2TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 99 98 109 106 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 79.8 Write 108 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 104 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0-CK0 16x8GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 16 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	MC Read 38.6 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 31.8 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	89x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	147x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	20x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	19x