Dell Latitude E6530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6530  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0JC5MT
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '18 at 16:43
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 64
2-Core 116
54% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 296
32% 254 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 0535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 2.88
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.96
4% 5.08 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120G 120GB
79GB free (System drive), PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 35 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 36.1
Write 31.5
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 33.5
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 10.9
806% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 13.6
1,032% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 155%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 0.9
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6530 Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback